Hookers, martyrs and conspiracy.
The problem comes when you wake up, when the mind-body relationship has not yet been able to be filtered by vanity such as self-control and mediation of the senses, and then just press the tip of the thumb on buttons on the phone causes me a sharp pain. Should I stop modeling
wire, but instead I'll finish with the surrounding myself with my steam-punk idols and talk with them all without the need to update this blog.
I just have to get to that point where I can consider them and other live-from-me, and then you - contemporary prints - you are no longer needed.
If you think that such a practice could be symptomatic of a certain alienation, think about all those people who keep a secret diary.
The ultimate purpose of creation does not, of Bunker, given the ease from having lived on his own skin narrated the context (or does not have the ability to recreate it). It has more the tone of ' introduction to prison, represented by the expressionist images of violence (just got to draw from the repertoire abused terms of reviews).
has something else, quite unique, and is embodied in the descriptions of Juliette Devlin, You do not set out in the doomsday scenario (in prison riot, no man's land, total anarchy, the delusion that captures the city besieged and conquered, tears Bosch to - expressly mentioned - unconscious and innate human cruelty). Willocks is a progressive and puts himself in the head Devlin, progressive, in turn, a woman who goes beyond all that crap about women from Venus and men from Mars and so on. Devlin is not, like many his fellow literary praise but not too much so, that is praised but not to the point of be more masculine of the male protagonist. For now (I'm on page 328) there is a good balance between the two protagonists, and their difference of character does not serve to justify the now accepted ineptitude of women in the climate of violence. In short, laudable - if not realized that Devlin not to assume the role of the woman who proves to be strong, took over another: the boy's novice is introduced to a world of "dog eat dog" and must therefore won the respect of others. Very Bildungsroman, in other words - in short, Devlin reminds me of Ron Becker Animal Factory, and do not know if it's a step forward and one back to me so much hate in matters of gender .
Putting aside the tedious questions of gender , I developed a passion for the psychopath to turn (Grauerholz) to a vague dislike the fact that the protagonist is the kind of character who is respected but not aggressive (easy way to remain politically correct).
The steps that cite increased, revealing a Willocks able to have visions of the world closer to the mystical philosophy - we like it, we like.
I woke up realizing that he wanted to see J and the fact that it was not the first time. It has a template still confused in the sense that when you wake up I can not remember how was represented in my dreams, and then only remains for me the feeling attached to this statue. Tends to the positive-neutral, ie the positivity that gives you a relaxing room where you feel at ease. Do not warn my unconscious. Congratulations
, J. You have entered the repertoire of the extras of my dreams. And the only thing I remember is that I spoke of Genet - or talked about in your book - no, you mentioned the subtle, intelligent style Pauca , To pick and talk about it.
We have a coffee.
is the opening sentence breaks, because cigarettes do not have and never had that role in my life. Smoke while I read, write, think, home system - I can even smoke while I eat and do.
The coffee is different, be prepared. Caffeine down in my body relaxes - that paradox, paradoxical in the eyes of people living with an addiction. We
coffee.
on Facebook now running:
Among friends, we decided to do something special on Facebook.
In a time when the press, voyeuristic and morbid, seems to attribute to women as the only professional "work the world's oldest" rediscover the great women of the past, to allow those present to have different patterns of identification and do not inhibit the development of those of the future.
Choose a great woman of history and use the photo in your profile.
Forward this message to as many 'women FACCIAMOGLIELA know and see us!
I, as usual, applying the principle of Lokasenna divulged.
is better than the previous degrading chains ( To the men crazy we put on our status as the color of the bras we wear, only the color, so we do not understand anything and go crazy! and things like the content), and that idea is not bad, but it remains the unresolved question: Why in secret?
And what is "facciamogliela see us"? Who? I would mention
Something like that, I loved writing entries that are Lokasenna , and paid tribute to the last public:
Alessia Marcuzzi The other night was doing a lecture guy in the Big Brother for being the bitch to another competitor. "You have insulted all women!" - The thundering rhetoric Marcuzzi, while the neckline two heavy tits fearless faced the cruelty of dermatological forty years.
someone explain why for some time now, any insult to a woman automatically becomes an insult directed to the entire female population? They are the only simple-minded to think that probably the guy in question did not want to launch a disrespectful anathema against the general moral degradation of the fairer sex, but was simply telling Monica - Monica and only - that is a dirty whore cocksucker?
If I were you I would feel insulted women rather than dull cow Alessia Marcuzzi for even remotely suggested that - despite the hours I have spent studying civil procedure, employment status respectable and decent economic empowerment - the only evidence will force you to possess a vagina to identify emotionally with the first bitch that leccascroto sculetta on a cube of Channel 5.
Berlusconi tells Rosy Bindi is a mussel? "We are outraged! Humiliates women. "
No, he's just saying that the son of a bitch is disgusting like a scorpion that wallows in a toilet spattered with diarrhea in the middle of a video clip of Crystal Castles.
not that every time someone gives head to cock Cicchitto I feel insulted as a man.
something I love, love how all the criticism-free survival instinct. That does not mean abolishing all forms of media indignation before a degradation of the "woman" (whatever that is), but we have enough outrage in Italy binge, I think. And then the problem is repeated with the same basic pattern Manichean, well summed up by saying that "even women are [adjective]." You THAT ' also you fuck, moderate fervent feminists, such as " also gays are [adjective]." With homosexuality can be reached at peak times adorable, summarized in a " also gays are normal .
Because that is what we speak, people genderization: normal. And the Italian legislation, namely the Italian neutrality, is summed up in a heterosexual male. A heterosexual male does not have to constantly prove to be normal, and therefore can afford - for example - some amusing vulgarity without fear of being branded. I love the vulgarity some fun and then I find myself loving more men than women - and this might tell someone that I admire more men than women, but it would be wrong, wrong to say that whites are more likely Negroes (indignatevi for this word - easy to get angry for words) for the case in a country where 98% of non-white population is too poor to afford their university studies. Becoming a lawyer does not become a black man a mozzarella (this will not outraged, right?), And a certain vulgarity funny does not make me a man. Along
the linkages of these Aristotelian syllogisms in reverse, the fact that I have a vagina does not mean that I'm a whore (purely arbitrary in the sense used by the chain of Facebook) - but it is true that in certain contexts're crippled from the outset and then You have to show, not a whore (as Juliette Devlin has to do his apprenticeship to show of being unable to break the kneecaps to someone with a wrench, because a lot of books in the context represented by the first requirement for someone to break the kneecaps with a wrench is not to have a wrench, but being a man).
Nevertheless, I find it quite ironic to show the world that also women may or may not be prostitutes with a chain for women only. I mean, I imagine that the inhabitants of the homelands South Africa during apartheid would not have felt so sorry for the idea that files showing the validity of the cd. "Negro race" was like that of the cd. "White race". Maybe some "neutral" white could believe in such equality.
I like comparisons between females and blacks, because the issues of equality in the second case have been - at least in some environments - eliminating the problem solved at birth or denying that there is a cd. "Negro race." Science says that there is only one race: human. So I hope that one day the problems of equality between men and women to be solved by stopping anything connected (character traits, physical - except the genitals and breasts, all right - religious inclinations, violence, etc. ...) to the shape of the genitalia.
A mad white South African Rian Malan is appreciated by me, who wrote My Traitor's Heart , I recommend a book that showcases the issues that arise when you believe in equality between different skin colors but I am perfectly aware that you are part of an 8% of the population that should not change the system of apartheid. And not just for economic reasons. I've had to think about white European women, who believes in certain values (such as: gender equality), and - if you were to leave certain people the chance to recover some power - while leaving to these populations the possibility of establishing a society in which men are considered superior to women. Well, imagine there is an ethnic group X harassed by the usual ghost multinationals based in Europe, and that this ethnic group consider men superior to women, and that you are women could, letting them control of the country where you live? The problem of
Malan was a bit 'different: a white, along with many other whites, began to fear for their lives. He realized that the Bantu he met on the street could not see who was Malan (ie a person who worked actively for the overthrow of apartheid), he could only see a white - and whites were the oppressors.
I wonder, in reference to the chain of Facebook, if men are the oppressors that we must defend ( FACCIAMOGLIELA SEE U.S.! ).
Malan said that no ruling class committed suicide - an idea that justifies the revolutions. Who knows if he was right.
The big difference is that in Italy there are no laws that discriminate. There are rules that do, of course (see: sports - and expectations downward against women who know so much about noblesse oblige), but above all cultural rules.
But if I were to make a call, I speak for everyone. To men who think women are all whores (and I do not know many, not enough to organize a plan half Masonic Facebook), to those who accept that women are their peers as one accepts the existence of homosexuals as long as no try it with you (to all the people who have told me and I will tell you: you are fucking hypocrites - especially if you have tried with me, why should I tell you that I accept your heterosexuality as long as not harassing me with it - d'oh , I think I have often said) and then to women, in general, because I can not say that a woman should not cook for his companion, each must be free to enjoy his life as he wishes, so I should speak to all women who have not been analyzed to understand how their choices are dictated by a society in which there is a cultural apartheid of gender not institutionalized.
There you are, for example, you want a salary equal to that of your partner, but you pretend that those courts will pay dinner on the first date.
But you can not stand when making jokes on the inability of a woman to fix a pipe, and when he flooded the toilet like to leave you with your brother is pleased to fix it. Do not even know where he is holding the tool box at home.
But you're worse. You have silenced his colleague when he said that women are inherently weaker, and then you explained to her friends as a man who proves to be stronger than you in bed does not make you wet - is stronger than you is nature. Your friend, however, that consoled you after connects the output of the weakness of women, it feels right to burst into tears when her husband does not remember their anniversary because women are more emotional, that are more sensitive , and men can not understand them and do not have even tried to explain to her husband because in the middle of a fuck she has started to cry (cry because you are not putting sensitive, but because it is a weak dick, who lives in a culture that accepts the fact that she is weak, and then she started convenient).
Your cousin, however, you told of how two nights ago she and her partner have heard a strange noise coming from the ground floor, and how he has fallen in check - except that horror movies teach that you should never divide, it has on her husband could not get her?
And the one whose boyfriend, to defend (from an insult, that was a compliment, but it was a compliment offensive, and given that the words hurt more than the sword, it is logical to react with the knuckles), he had a fight with a guy in a club, and she burst into tears, worried she could not move her ass bound and try to divide?
Rather be in bed, not knowing where the tool box, after a sex session in which he was killed buttocks and biceps pumping like a real man, to choose a historical figure for the female profile on Facebook.
participate in, if I could think of a historical figure worthy women. But I have the same problem that presents itself to me with some amusing irony: things that make me love a historical figure I find them often in women.
We tried a lot - enough to fill shelves in the library - to revalue women starting with the history, but the only result was to give a positive connotation to the whores, the martyrs and the conspirators, for the story to our available offers. Hookers that by dint of giving it to the right people have managed to gain a bit ' power (ie that for which you accuse the "escort" today), martyrs who have solved the issue of gender coming out of the game (ie the system of secular marriages of life) and older women, however great they were, above had a husband or a brother-re-re. It is not their fault: I'm sure Veronica Franco would have preferred to be born with the power with which to please the dead than going through the vanity and testes of half-Venice, and then - oh my emancipation - the solution lies in giving dignity to the profession "prostitute" (that's a separate matter), otherwise you find yourself with the bookshelves full of books that - in the wake of a revaluation of femininity in history - using reams toying with the anatomical details of sexual positions and reconfirm the usual cliches copy / pasted from Playboy (and I know that both women and men draw from there, because I go to bed with both and see where you put the poses - both ).
Elizabeth I, unfortunately, that is me on the balls, he probably realized that the only way not to succumb to the sexist laws of his time was not to marry - and chose to become a martyr (virgin) to avoid becoming a conspiracy behind of her husband. But me being a pain, so I can not put on Facebook.
There might be a Pope Joan, given my love for the clergy, but its historical significance is quite clear: they can not become a great woman, pretend you are a man becoming a great man - underlining the scale of values. Personally I really love
Wallenstein as a figure, like epic of life, but where can I find a woman who has put up an army? Joan of Arc is not the case, belongs to the category of "martyr" and could not have a good time fucking whores (male or female were) in tow. I am sure that there is a female figure comparable to Wallenstein, the story is all over with a consequent fall in the exception which confirms the rule, but in which file I should slip to find it? And find an image to put on Facebook?
Even Jan van Leiden, in his personal way, was a martyr - with 16 wives.
Joachim Peiper is not bad, as models of military historical figure, but I know many women who were younger SS-Standartenführer - do not even know many women who were SS-Standartenführer - Beate Uhse know that during the war was a pilot, but I know why he founded the largest chain of sex shops in Germany (and back to the ball "whore").
I would love to participate in the upgrading of the female characters in the story, but my basic problem is that the values that attract me are linked to gluttony (and who better to be pimping whores, do not you?) And power (without the ' humiliating awareness that the first male heir to the throne step can fuck) together, side by adding a taste for the political games (not maneuvered half vaginal contractions a powerful political figure).
My basic problem is that I will not pretend to believe that the whore or the martyr or the conspiracy corresponds to having an enviable position. Nay. Who
read a lot of literature written by dead people know that in a work of fiction than 150 years ago is useless to seek a female character in which identification (with rare exceptions - Mary Stuart by Schiller), because in general are poorly characterized. It is no accident that Flaubert is remembered for having written Madame Bovary . Taken for what good, you can still take a few classic pearl to keep inside: just surrender to the fact that the exemplary virtues appear enviable in male characters. I loved to death Notre-Dame de Paris for human specimens revealed, and Hugo was one of two historic money if he had staged a woman archdeacon, a captain of the guards of Paris woman and a poet of the street would have been very unlikely in the Middle Ages. It would be less today, archdeacon apart, but today there is a company for which there is a position to cover it from a woman who will put it in the same situation of a burning Frollo.
The revaluation of women's fashion through history, I suppose, would take Esmeralda and try to give her dignity - and, speaking of gypsies and imagining that sex does not exist, you prefer to be the head of the court of miracles or a gypsy that sucker is drawn to the love of the wrong people? Ok, actually I think the underlying problem may be in fact that many people prefer the latter.
were women's studies and post-colonial studies to assert repeatedly that Joseph Conrad was a racist misogynist, but who was not at the time than our fees? Instead of looking at a copy of Conrad decent woman, why not learn from the good that Conrad is up to date regardless of the sex?
If you forget the sex of the characters in Faust, and you wonder who would want to be, would you rather be the character who is seduced and abandoned or what appeals in an attempt to improve himself? If you forget
on the sex of the characters from The Betrothed , and you wonder who would want to be, would you rather be a mysterious individual who has a strategic power over other good or just a human being to prison and chastity, and it has no way to decide their fate?
If you forget the sex of the characters of The Picture of Dorian Gray , and you wonder who would want to be, would you rather be a dandy for all subsidized or starlet that makes sense when she was noticed and soon loses no longer attractive?
On Facebook I see as an avatar, apart from the above mentioned Elizabeth I, Cleopatra - removed the sex, or she would have preferred to be Julius Caesar?
Should I continue? The
stop to ask the history of women give birth in positions yearnings, though women in most of the story could not even aim for a certain position?
Virginia Woolf, in 1938, wrote (in relation to the war):
All These facts will convince her reason (to put it in a nutshell) That her sex and her class has very little to thank England for in the past. [...]
Therefore if you insist upon fighting to protect me, or 'Our' country, let it be understood soberly and rationally between us, That you are fighting to prosecutors benefits [...] Which I have not shared Probably not, and will share.
Virginia Woolf wrote Orlando , which has the magical property to show what happens to a man if a woman becomes what happens to his social position, his freedom, his property.
may stop in the awkward attempt to ask the women in history to be something they could not be even if they wanted to strengthen the link between women and prostitutes, women and martyrs, women and the idea that conspire whispering? I mean, the division of women into whores and angelic enough colors the worldview of many men (and women themselves, who feel angelic when they are injured and become whores when they want pleasure).
0 comments:
Post a Comment